提高寫作能力也非一日可成。而許多考生雖然投入了不少時(shí)間精力進(jìn)行復(fù)習(xí)卻無法獲得有效的能力和得分提升。下面小編就和大家分享GRE寫作訓(xùn)練方法思路，來欣賞一下吧。
GRE寫作訓(xùn)練方法思路
明確GRE作文要求套路
GRE寫作有兩篇議論性文章的寫作要求，而每篇文章的寫作時(shí)間只有30分鐘，這就決定了其難度并不低，考生必須在極短時(shí)間內(nèi)完成從審題、構(gòu)思到寫好文章的整個(gè)過程。而具體文章應(yīng)該分幾段，每段寫什么內(nèi)容;大作文應(yīng)該怎么布局，內(nèi)容和語言何者為重。這些都是考生必須掌握的基本要素。換句話說，就是掌握作文怎么寫的問題。大家首先要具有明確的思路和流程步驟，拿到題目花幾分鐘理解，幾分鐘列提綱，文章大致分成幾個(gè)段落，這些都需要做到充分熟練，拿到題目就能立即開動(dòng)，如果太過隨心所欲，考試時(shí)間很可能會(huì)捉襟見肘，最后得分自然不會(huì)太理想。
重點(diǎn)寫好首尾段并注意檢查
希望大家能夠留下哪怕是兩分鐘的時(shí)間來檢查。首先要檢查拼寫，雖然GRE作文沒有托福語言要求那么嚴(yán)格，但也不意味著有十來個(gè)拼寫錯(cuò)誤也能得滿分。還要看看語法，有沒有代詞指代不清，主謂不一致，單復(fù)數(shù)問題，時(shí)態(tài)錯(cuò)誤，或者第三人稱單數(shù)沒加s等情況。還有語言風(fēng)格，盡管有時(shí)候符合語法，但有沒有不嚴(yán)密的地方，或者過于口語化的地方，看看能不能用更加書面化的詞匯加以替換。兩分鐘掃描是最理想的。明顯的錯(cuò)誤可以改過來，不明顯的錯(cuò)誤閱卷人也未必能看出來。另外，要注意行文時(shí)文章是否有足夠的轉(zhuǎn)承連接詞，以顯示文章的連貫性。要格外注意開頭段、結(jié)尾段和每一段的第一句話，切實(shí)做到“金玉其外”----在這些最敏感的地方，把最高的水平展現(xiàn)給閱卷人。當(dāng)然，如果真的沒實(shí)力，那么寧可不出彩，也不要出錯(cuò)。
參考高分范文學(xué)習(xí)精華寫法
考生在寫作來備考要大量學(xué)習(xí)參考高分滿分范文。請(qǐng)注意，就算你的作文心理預(yù)期得分只有4分，你在范文選擇上也必須看最好的文章。因?yàn)榉段谋緛砭褪怯脕斫梃b的，一定要保質(zhì)保量。此外，學(xué)習(xí)范文比起單純的學(xué)習(xí)一些抽象的寫作理論來要更為實(shí)際具體，通過分析范文中的亮點(diǎn)，考生的寫作能力和語言積累能夠得到迅速地提高。
積累實(shí)際寫作經(jīng)驗(yàn)提升熟練度
寫作需要自己動(dòng)手，看再多的范文也不如自己親手寫一篇。很多時(shí)候考生面臨的不是沒有思路，而是有了思路卻無法圓轉(zhuǎn)自如地通過寫作表達(dá)出來。自己親手寫文章，能夠幫助考生發(fā)現(xiàn)很多原本不知道的問題。打字速度、拼寫錯(cuò)誤、遣詞造句，這些因?yàn)榛A(chǔ)而常常受到忽視的寫作細(xì)節(jié)，往往只有通過動(dòng)筆練習(xí)才能發(fā)現(xiàn)。而比起上了考場(chǎng)才發(fā)現(xiàn)各種疏漏，通過考前的練習(xí)就找到問題并加以解決才是上策，也是備考需要做好的工作。
GRE寫作高分范文：批判性思維
GRE寫作范文：
Too much time, money, and energy are spent developing new and more elaborate technology. Society should instead focus on maximizing the use of existing technology for the immediate benefit of its citizens.
I must say that I reject this statement. While it is true that we need to support society as much as possible with current technology, that does not in any way mean that we should stop progressing simply because our current technology cannot handle all the problems we have brought to it. Does that mean that we should simply accept the status quo and make do? No, I don’t think so. To do so would be tantamount to adopting a fatalistic approach; I think most people would reject that.
Technology has helped, and it has hurt. Without it, we would never have our standard of living, nor quality of nutrition, expectation of a long and productive life span, and the unshakable belief that our lives can be made even better. But it has also brought us universal pollution, weapons so powerful as to be capable of rendering us extinct, and the consequent fear for our survival as species and as a planet. Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. And yet, I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.
Some might argue that we would be better off without technology. They might say that a return to a less technologically driven approach to life would have the benefits of reducing stress and allowing us to live simpler, happier lives, like those of our forebears. Such an idea is seductive, so much so that much of art and all of nostalgia are devoted to it. But upon closer inspection, one realizes that such a move would only return us to a life of different kinds of stress, one of false simplicity, one fraught with danger. It would be a life
without antibiotics where a minor cut could prove deadly. It would be a life where childbirth is the main killer of women, and where an emergency is dealt with in terms of hours and days instead of minutes and hours; a life where there are no phones or cars or planes or central heating, no proven drug therapies to treat mental illness, no computers. Would this world really make people happy?
What we already have, we have. And since the only way to move is forward, instead of allowing ourselves to be paralyzed by fear and worry, we need to learn how to clean up the pollution we have caused, and how to deal with a world that feeds on weapons and mass destruction. Doing these things means having to move away from technology into a more difficult realm, that of diplomacy and compromise: to move from the bully stance of “I am bigger and better and I have more toys and so I win” to a place where everyone wins.
Technology is the thing that will allow people to do that. But, advanced as it is, it is still in its infancy. We have to allow it to grow up and mature in order to reap the real rewards that it can bring. And there are even greater rewards ahead of us than what the world has already experienced. When technology is pushed to the outer edge, that is where serendipitous discoveries can occur. This has been seen throughout technological advancement, but the easiest example is probably the space program which made us think, really hard, about how to do things in a different environment. It gave us telecommunications, new fabrics and international cooperation. Paramedical devices, so that people can be treated even as they are being transported to the hosptal, are a direct development of that technology. None of this would have happened in the time frame that it did if we had not pushed for technological advancement. If we had decided to
第二段：
(概述科技的兩面性)Technology has helped, and it has hurt. (具體討論科技的貢獻(xiàn))Without it, we would never have our standard of living, nor quality of nutrition, expectation of a long and productive life span, and the unshakable belief that our lives can be made even better. (具體討論科技的危害)But it has also brought us universal pollution, weapons so powerful as to be capable of rendering us extinct, and the consequent fear for our survival as species and as a planet. Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. (表明已考慮到科技的危害，但是依然堅(jiān)持自己立場(chǎng))And yet, I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.
第三段：
(提出反方的立場(chǎng))Some might argue that we would be better off without technology. They might say that a return to a less technologically driven approach to life would have the benefits of reducing stress and allowing us to live simpler, happier lives, like those of our forebears. Such an idea is seductive, so much so that much of art and all of nostalgia are devoted to it. (通過具體論據(jù)反駁反方的觀點(diǎn))But upon closer inspection, one realizes that such a move would only return us to a life of different kinds of stress, one of false simplicity, one fraught with danger. It would be a life without antibiotics where a minor cut could prove deadly. It would be a life where childbirth is the main killer of women, and where an emergency is dealt with in terms of hours and days instead of minutes and hours; a life where there are no phones or cars or planes or central heating, no proven drug therapies to treat mental illness, no computers. Would this world really make people happy?
第四段：
(在第三段駁論的基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)一步立論)What we already have, we have. And since the only way to move is forward, instead of allowing ourselves to be paralyzed by fear and worry, we need to learn how to clean up the pollution we have caused, and how to deal with a world that feeds on weapons and mass destruction. Doing these things means having to move away from technology into a more difficult realm, that of diplomacy and compromise: to move from the bully stance of “I am bigger and better and I have more toys and so I win” to a place where everyone wins.
第五段：
Technology is the thing that will allow people to do that. (指出支持觀點(diǎn)存在的一點(diǎn)不足)But, advanced as it is, it is still in its infancy. (解決方案)We have to allow it to grow up and mature in order to reap the real rewards that it can bring. And there are even greater rewards ahead of us than what the world has already experienced. When technology is pushed to the outer edge, that is where serendipitous discoveries can occur. This has been seen throughout technological advancement, but the easiest example is probably the space program which made us think, really hard, about how to do things in a different environment. It gave us telecommunications, new fabrics and international cooperation. Paramedical devices, so that people can be treated even as they are being transported to the hospital, are a direct development of that technology. None of this would have happened in the time frame that it did if we had not pushed for technological advancement. If we had decided to “focus on maximizing the use of existing technology” instead of foolishly reaching for the stars, we would not have made those discoveries which now are the bedrock of the 21st century.
gre滿分作文重點(diǎn)：Critical Thinking.當(dāng)然，提高critical thinking能力的同時(shí)，也很有必要包裝語言。
GRE寫作高分范文：名人觀點(diǎn)
GRE寫作范文：
When famous people give their opinions, many people listen. Should we pay attention to those remarks?
When Tom Cruise once appeared in a TV program, he was too excited so he jumped up and down the couch. Later “jump the couch” was adopted in the American dictionary for slang. This is a bit exaggerating, but it definitely reflects the fact that when famous people give their opinions, many people listen. But, should we pay attention to these remarks or actions?
Firstly, famous people are “famous”, for they have one or few aspects that exceed common people. Like Albert Einstein once said, “I think and think for months, for years, ninety-nine times the conclusion false, but the hundredth time I am right.” As a brilliant scientist, he speaks of the right attitudes towards science and inspires countless people to fight for the truth. Hollywood actors or actresses, they may talk about their dressing styles or skin cares on magazine. These are all advice that we might as well take, for real life is not just serious academic things but also the satisfaction of living.
But the point is that, celebrities are not perfect role models for the public. Once I heard a story about Einstein, saying that he nearly got into the water when he once harassed a young lady and got refused when they were in a boat in a park. Is Einstein evil somehow? No! He’s just being human. Then is it wrong to harass ladies? Yes. But all humans make mistakes. Celebrities are experts in certain areas but not all. In some other fields, they should even learn from us.
Generally, there are two extremes when talking about celebrities: the public are either too critical or too superstitious. Objectively, both of the attitudes are unnecessary. As a Chinese saying which generalizes this situation the best goes: to take in the good, while to get rid of the bad.
GRE寫作相關(guān)文章：
★ GRE寫作:高分技巧
★ GRE寫作:高分沖刺
★ GRE寫作:怎樣準(zhǔn)備提綱
★ GRE寫作:寫作論據(jù)的技巧
★ GRE背單詞記不住怎么辦
★ 學(xué)習(xí)資料庫
★ 組織主題夏令營活動(dòng)策劃方案2020
★ 《金字塔原理》觀后感精選范文1000字
★ 夏令營特色活動(dòng)策劃方案
★ 夏令營實(shí)踐主題活動(dòng)策劃方案范文
