GRE作文看重邏輯思維能力，但邏輯思維能力在短時間很難獲得很大的提高，不過具體到GRE的Issue寫作中，我們是可以通過學會邏輯的組織技巧來組織論證，下面小編就和大家分享GRE寫作高分論述寫法指點，來欣賞一下吧。

GRE寫作高分論述寫法指點

1. 對特殊詞匯做前提式討論

即對題目中某個特殊的單詞進行前提式討論，作為全文展開討論的基礎。

可以用作前提論證的素材單詞往往包括：

A、帶有主觀感情色彩的判斷詞，比如Just，Correct，Effective，Reasonable等等。

在討論這些觀點詞時就必須確立一個標準，進而為全文的討論確定標準，常見的比如“對社會中大部分人有利”“對社會穩定有利”“能使資源有效分配，最低投入最高產出”等等。

B、作用、意義、任務等值得討論的名詞關鍵詞，比如Education，Government，Law，Teacher等等。

這些詞其實在間接討論A類判斷詞，即“B類詞干什么才是A類詞(教育干什么才是對的，法律干什么才是有效的……)”，由此確定判別一個事物該做什么的標準，才能在全文中討論題目說的此事物做的東西是否正確。

前提論證的好處是從字面出發，確定主基調，可以防止全文的發展出現價值觀的自我矛盾導致的中心論點混亂，從而將文章后面的各段拉到一起。換句話說，就是我們討論什么問題時，需要先把什么別的一個小問題說清楚。前提論證法可以有效保證后文段落的邏輯有效聯系。

2. 由低到高提升論述層次

前提論證屬于前提層面，后面自然有更高階的層面，之前提到的學術、社會、個人就是這種層面層次。

其實我們寫ISSUE在組織分論點無外乎就兩種，一種同層面展開，一種層面升華式展開。同層面展開可以有辨證法、分領域討論，而不同層面的升華則包括了不同的哲學層次。這二者都屬于ISSUE題目要求中的“perspectives”。

而大家最喜歡用的保留式同意/反對，那個保留論點通常就是站在不同的層面上來看待問題，從而得出的不同結論。

一方面，層面升華可以使你的論證涵蓋不同的邏輯深度，從而保證對問題看法的全面性，另一方面，層面升華也能使文章的整體組織層層遞進，做到結構嚴密。

具體來說，常見的層面包括：

A、字面意義。見前提論證

B、學術層面。學習知識的有效性、合理性等等。這個層面比較淺，原因在于我們還要追問學習的目的是什么?接下來可以引出社會層面和個人層面。

C、社會層面。一個論點可能本身沒什么錯誤，但一旦承認它的正確性，就會導致種.種不堪設想的后果，比如過分強調有的法律不公正而造成犯罪分子有自己的道理，或者過分強調社會秩序的重要性造成獨裁當道民不聊生。

D、個人層面。之所以把這個放到最高層面是因為社會效應最終是作用于個人的。升華到最后往往是人類幸福、身心愉悅這種目的。個人層面的評論標準有很多，比如人本主義、弗洛伊德精神分析學說、唯物論、社會道德、先驗主義等等。具體的可以查閱相關資料。

層面升華的好處是可以讓文章環環相扣，步步深入，最后的論證深度恰倒好處，而結構也嚴密可靠。

3. 結合正反兩面論證

正反論證就是說先說明了一個事物的必要性，然后說明缺乏它以后的后果。表面上看這象是廢話，但其實正反論證能讓你說的問題更加明白有有力，而且由于邏輯轉折簡單，非常好把握。對于打字速度快的同學正反論證其實十分好用。

正反論證的好處很明顯，正反段相互依存，互為解釋，因此兩段之間的邏輯完全咬合。如果全文都以這種手法組織，結構組織就會變得的非常輕松。官方范文就是個很好的例子：說明專家的必要性后先說正“反”，再說反“反”，整個文章兩頭照顧，內容嚴謹。

在具體的操作上，正反論證往往是用反去證明正缺失(或過分)的后果，借以說明論證“正”的過程的合理性。

嚴格來講對于過度的所生的“反”應該另立名詞，我這里為了方便就把二者放到一起說了。因為沒有正確性就沒有過分的可能，這一點上過度所產生的“反”與“正”的“反”是相同的。物極必反也可以說是辯證法的一個角度，當然與層面升華后產生的反面評價是不同的。

GRE寫作高分范文：道德與法律

Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system because moral behavior cannot be legislated.

現代社會的很多問題是法律和立法系統無法解決的，因為道德行為是無法用法律約束的。

GRE寫作范文：

The proposition asserts that the laws and the legal system cannot resolve many problems problem of the modern society since moral behavior cannot be legislated. In my point of view, I fundamentally agree with the speaker, as discussed below.

First of all, I concede that the laws and the legal system are essential to the modern society and they can resolve many problems. Common sense tells us that everyone has his own position and behavior, depending on their beliefs, experiences, knowledge, professions and emotional concern.However, we cannot simply let everyone do everything that he or she wants, since this will lead to mess and may harm the stability of the society. Thus, the government has to announce the laws and build a just legal system to restrict the citizens. Only by doing this, can the society get to a balance and harmonious status? For instance, the industrial factories want to expel the polluted water into the river without making it clean. If there is not a law or a legal system to restrict the factories from expelling the polluted water, the poisoned water may get into the river, even the sea. This will be really harmful. It may firstly kill the animals living in the river, it may also further harm the human beings if they have drunk the water or eaten the polluted fish. It may bring damage to the environment as well. Considering this, we have to establish laws to prevent the factories from expelling polluted water and other detriments. From this case, we can see how important laws and legal systems are.

However, we have to admit that the laws and the legal systems cannot resolve many problems in the modern society as well, such as the usage of euthanasia, the homosexual marriage. When the Watson and Crick found the double-helix structure of the gene and the scientists further found the way to clone. It brings many social problems that the laws and legal systems cannot resolve. Should the scientists clone human beings? If yes, then what is the relationship between the two? Do the cloned people have the same right with the other human being or even whether they are human beings or not? Though the legal systems in many countries ban the scientists from cloning people, some scientists still do this secretly. All these questions cannot simply be resolved by the laws as it is related to the morality.

Additionally, the laws can not involve the moral behavior. If the laws consider the moral behaviors too much, it will lose justice. Nevertheless, only considering the laws without morals may cause mistake. For instance, in India, their law is statutes given by the government and the judge can only his judges on the bases of the existing laws. Once, a mother in India killed her son,who is a murderer and did lots of bad things. The police in India tried to catch him for years without any result. He committed so many crimes that even death cannot atone for the offence.His mother knows that her son will kill many more people if she does not kill him. Thus, when her son came back to see her one day, she killed him with the poison. In this case, to kill the mother is probably not the best choice, since this may make people think that being just is wrong. But according to the present law, the judger had to sentenced the mother to death, and this brought a widely debate thought out the country.

Further, only the morality can make people to understand what is right and what is wrong, and to restrict people with morality will be a good way. Under the pressure of laws and legal systems,many people just do the bad thing secretly because they do not know that they are wrong. And many people may even think that the laws are wrong and disobey or even resist the law. They may commit crimes again after they are punished. Only when a people have known the morality and find the right measurement to distinguish right and wrong, they can find their mistakes and become a better person. A statistics involving many prisons in China find that the prisoners who learn morality and know their mistakes have a much lower rate of committing crime again.

In the final analysis, we can see that the laws and legal system cannot resolve all the problems in the society and therefore we should agree with the author.

GRE寫作高分范文：丑聞

Scandals-whether in politics, academia, or other areas-can be useful.They focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.

丑聞――無論是政治、學術還是其他領域――可能會是有用的。丑聞可以用演說家或者改革家無法使用的手段讓我們注意到某些問題。

GRE寫作范文：

Scandals occur in nearly every field that human set foot in, both revealed and incubative.Once people recognize that the person they adored yesterday is actually a liar by the exposednesses of his scandal, the first reaction may be anger, sorrow and depression.However, if rational rethinking and remediation have been taken after the reports of scandals, actually greater progresses can always be achieved compared with the efforts made by the daily boring speeches made by speakers and reformers.

Scandals can clearly show us the hidden unreasonable and unjust regulations, therefore administers or the public can adjust or even correct those errors. After the Watergate Event, not only President Nixon lost his job, but further influence was conducted by the public and medium. They realized that the problem of the abuse of power which was neglected in the past. As a result, a closer scrutiny upon the high officials of government prevents them from abusing their power any longer. Recently, the filthy relationship between Juventus Club and several references was publicized by medium, which shocked the football circle by those large holes in the institutions of football league and thus forced the Italia Football Association to take actions towards Juventus, references and the ill institutions. While Juventus has been deprived the former championship, a series of more appropriate regulations have at last been added into the football systems. There is no denying that those scandals indeed prohibit the daily operations and developments of certain fields to some extent, but these deleterious effects can be temporary, if proper measures have been done immediately. In this case, scandals may become stimulations that can provoke the awareness of the emergency of the scandals, which is necessary for establishment of an ultimate solutions to the present problems.

Furthermore, compared with the accomplishments endowed by the professional speakers and reformers, the progresses made by the aftereffects of scandals are often more significant and fast. A scandal maker usually has his position in high status, which grants him power great enough to make his underground and illegal behavior so harmful and astonishing that it can be called a scandal. Before their scandals have been known to the public, they are generally admired and trusted by their superiors and inferiors, as well as the medium and public. Therefore, it is difficult or even impossible for speakers and reformers to win the battle against those scandal makers and their inequitable laws or regulations without the support of anyone. No one believes or even pays attention on whatever the speakers and reformers assert, if the scandal makers are trying to cover up those events by their power and trust they gained at the same time. Consequently those errors remain forever. Once the secrets of the scandal makers give away, however, their aura fades, legends evaporate, so does the trust and power endued. Under such circumstances that all sides feel unsatisfied and disappointed, it is much easier for reformers to draw the focus on their ameliorative allegations towards the long existed problems, and thus, the improvements can be made. Perhaps it may be strange to accept the ironic conclusion that scandals do play a more vital role in healing the morbid system of a certain realm than those reformers do sometimes, but oftentimes it is scandal that helps the reformers a lot to strike their targets, which leads to a future primary achievements for society.

Despite the forgoing contributions of scandals, they are not without its apparent problems. Hypersensitive worries may lead serious disorders or even disasters. A threshold trouble is about the excessive revealment of privacies of the officials, stars, or other persons who were doubted to have scandals. This was often done by some so-called responsible mediums in the name of observation the social problems. As a result, the bothered officials or the stars can hardly utilize their full abilities to fulfill their tasks or jobs. Just to meet the curiosity of the public so that they can bolster their sales and profits, these mediums' detective behaviors will inevitably bring about disorders to those who in charge in some areas. Secondly, overstatements of the grave effects of scandals may shadow the contributions of the scandal makers unfairly. Although Clinton was accused by his rose event, his dedication towards the resuscitation and prosperity of America's economy during his term of office cannot be denied. If his fault was overemphasized present, he may have to resign immediately, and his economic ability can no longer serve the society,which is an obvious loss of the society.

To be just, I acknowledge that most people hate to witness scandals happening around them. What is more, recessions and the private violations always come along with scandals.Nevertheless, seeing from another angle, if the scandals are in fact ineluctable, it may be wiser to bravely face with the extant problems. We should find them out and then correct them rather than simply denying their existence.

GRE寫作相關文章：

★ GRE寫作:高分技巧

★ GRE寫作:高分沖刺

★ GRE寫作:怎樣準備提綱

★ GRE寫作:寫作論據的技巧

★ GRE背單詞記不住怎么辦

★ 學習資料庫

★ 組織主題夏令營活動策劃方案2020

★ 《金字塔原理》觀后感精選范文1000字

★ 夏令營特色活動策劃方案

★ 夏令營實踐主題活動策劃方案范文